Clausen v. Fox Hall et al
| Timothy Clausen |
| Early, Douglas, County Correction, Douglas County, City of Omaha, Fox Hall, Hebbad, Omaha Police and Racofered |
| 8:2013cv00189 |
| June 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum and Order and in the court's Memorandum and Order dated October 22, 2013, this matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The clerk's office is directed to place the "28USC1915(g)_STR" flag on this matter. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to file an amended complaint that clearly states a claim against Defendants. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complain t, or the court finds that the amended complaint is insufficient, this matter will be dismissed without further notice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In the event that Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintif f shall restate the allegations of the current Complaint and any new allegations. Failure to consolidate all claims into one document may result in the abandonment of claims. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadl ine in this case using the following text: November 22, 2013: Check for amended complaint. Plaintiff shall keep the court informed of his current address at all times while this case is pending. Failure to do so may result in dismissal without further notice. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff Timothy Clausen shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $19.40 by 8/26/13, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written motion. The clerk's office is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiff's institution. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline for 8/26/2013: initial partial filing fee payment due. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed to Douglas County Corrections, Attn: Steve Rangel or Peggy Wenninghoff, 710 South 17th Street, Omaha, NE 68102) (JSF)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: July 26, 2013: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party with AO240 Form)(TCL )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
