United States of America et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al
||United States of America
||Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Kingery Construction
||November 14, 2013
||Nebraska District Court
||8 Omaha Office
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||40:3131 Miller Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 5, 2014
ORDER that Defendants' request to change the place of trial from Omaha to Lincoln is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (JSF)
|October 16, 2014
AMENDED ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE: This case is before the court on the Joint Status Report and Motion for Extension of Deadlines 24 . The deadline extensions will be granted. Motions for summary judgment shall be filed not later than January 31, 2015. All depositions, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be completed by December 31, 2014. All interrogatories, requests for admission and requests for production or inspection, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be completed by November 30, 2014. Any request to extend the deadlines of this order shall be sought by motion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (ADB)
|January 13, 2015
JUDGMENT - In accordance with the parties' Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice 28 , this action is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to pay its own attorney's fees and costs. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (JSF)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.