The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al v. Peters et al
| Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company and The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| Five Points Bank, as Trustee of the Maxine Bielfeldt Trust, Susan C. Peters and Dawn M. Stange |
| 8:2014cv00042 |
| February 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| F.A. Gossett |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Parties' Stipulated Motion to Dismiss 38 is approved; All remaining claims in the above-captioned action are dismissed with prejudice; The Clerk of the Court shall disburse from the interpleaded funds the sum of &# 036;78,369.76 payable to "Susan C. Peters" c/o her attorney Roger Steele, P.O. Box 5104, Grand Island, NE 68802; The Clerk of the Court shall disburse from the interpleaded funds the sum of $210,000.00 payable to "Dawn M. Stan ge" c/o her attorney Charles W. Balsiger, P.O. Box 1776, Norfolk, NE 68702-1776; The Clerk of the Court shall disburse the remainder of the interpleaded funds, if any, payable to "Five Points Bank as Trustee of the Maxine Bielfeldt Trust" c/o its attorney, Kristopher J. Covi, 1601 Dodge Street, Suite 3700, Omaha, NE 68102; and Each party will pay its own costs and fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (SLP)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER - Pursuant to the parties' request in the July 16, 2014, mediation status report letter, IT IS ORDERED: Progression of the case is stayed until September 16, 2014, to allow the parties to engage in settlement discussions. The August 22, 2014, planning conference is continued to September 19, 2014, at 10:00 A.M., to be held by telephone call initiated by counsel for Susan C. Peters. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (TCL )
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR INTERPLEADER OF DEATH BENEFIT AND DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS - IT IS ORDERED: Within 21 days of the signing of this Order by the Court Prudential will distribute to the Clerk of this Court a check equal to the sum of $4 51,686.50, plus applicable claim interest, if any, representing the Death Benefit payable under the Policy. The Clerk of this Court will deposit the Death Benefit distributed by Prudential into an interest-bearing account and maintain the same pe nding further orders of the Court; Upon deposit of the Death Benefit with the Court, Prudential and Hartford are discharged from any and all liability to the Adverse Claimants relating to the Policy and/or the Death Benefit, and the Adverse Claim ants are permanently enjoined from making any further actual or implied claims, demands, or causes of action, asserted or unasserted, express or implied, foreseen or unforeseen, real or imaginary, suspected or unsuspected, known or unknown, liquid ated or unliquidated, of any kind, nature, or description whatsoever that Adverse Claimants, jointly and severally, ever had, presently have, may have, or claim or assert to have, or hereinafter have, may have, or claim or assert to have, against Prudential or Hartford with respect to the Policy and/or the Death Benefit. Prudential and Hartford are dismissed from the above-captioned action with prejudice. The Court will not assess costs. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), there being no just reason for delay, a separate Judgment will be entered. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy to Finance)(TCL )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
