Andrews v. City of Omaha Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Michael Andrews
Defendant: Michael Belcastro, City of Omaha Police Department, Omaha Housing Authority and Luciano Rizzo
Case Number: 8:2014cv00285
Filed: September 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: Lyle E. Strom
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION - A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR)
December 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER granting the 44 Motion to Extend. Defendants shall have until December 4, 2015, to file their motion for summary judgment. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
November 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants' 30 MOTION to Compel is granted. Plaintiff shall have until November 17, 2015, to answer defendants interrogatories and requests for admissions. In the event that plaintiff fails to answer the requests f or admission by November 17, 2015, the requests for admissions will be deemed admitted. In the event plaintiff fails to answer defendants' interrogatories by November 17, 2015, plaintiff's claims against defendants may be subject to dismissal without prejudice and without notice. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
November 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER granting the 37 Motion to Extend. Defendants shall have until November 30, 2015, to file their motion for summary judgment. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR)
October 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting 28 Motion to Extend. Plaintiff shall have until November 30, 2015, to file interrogatories, request for admission, request for production or inspection and extension of time for dispositive motions. If plaintiff wishes to receive email notice of filings, he needs to complete a CM/ECF registration form and file his documents electronically. The registration form can be obtained from the clerk's office or on its web site: www.ned.uscourts.gov. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
October 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting the 26 Motion to Extend. Defendants shall have until October 21, 2015, to file a motion to compel discovery. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
July 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendants' motion (Filing No. 13 ) is denied. The plaintiff's motion (Filing No. 17 ) is granted. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
March 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court considers the last two pages of plaintiffs brief (Filing No. 7 at CM/ECF pp. 382-383) as supplemental to plaintiff's amended complaint (Filing No. 6 ). The clerk's office is directed to add the following docket text to the already-existing text at Filing Number 7: "Court will consider CM/ECF pages 382-383 of this filing supplemental to the amended complaint (Filing No. 6)." This matter may proceed to service of process against defendants Luciano Rizzo and Michael Belcastro in their individual capacities. The clerk of the court is directed to send to plaintiff a copy of the amended complaint, a copy of this Memorandum and Order, and two summons forms and two USM 285 Forms for service on Belcastro and Rizzo. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of the complaint on a defendant within 120 days of filing the complaint. However, plaintiff is granted an extension of time until 120 days from the date of this order to c omplete service of process. If requested to do so in this matter, the United States Marshal will serve all process in this case without prepayment of fees from Plaintiff. In making such a request, plaintiff must complete the USM 285 forms to be sub mitted to the clerk of the court with the completed summons forms. Plaintiff' s claims against the City of Omaha Police Department and the Omaha Housing Authority, and his claims against Rizzo and Belcastro in their official capacities, are dism issed without prejudice to reassertion in a second amended complaint that complies with the general rules of pleading. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party with amended complaint, 2 summons forms and 2 USM 285 Forms) (MKR)
December 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Andrews will have 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to file an amended complaint that states a claim upon which relief can be granted. Failure to respond to this Memorandum and order will result in dismissal of this action without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 1/26/2015: check for response from Andrews) Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER provisionally granting the 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and the complaint shall be filed without payment of fees.Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrews v. City of Omaha Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Andrews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Belcastro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Omaha Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Omaha Housing Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luciano Rizzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?