Whitten v. City of Omaha et al
| Matthew Whitten |
| City of Omaha, John Does #1-#3 and John Martin |
| 8:2015cv00096 |
| March 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| John M. Gerrard |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation (filing 65 ) are adopted. This case is dismissed. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER that Plaintiff is given until February 7, 2017 to show cause why the court should not dismiss his claims for want of prosecution. The failure to timely comply with this order may result in dismissal of the claims filed by Plaintiff without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (LAC)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion to file an appeal in forma pauperis, (Filing No. 58 ), is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- The defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (filing 39 ) is granted in part and denied in part, as set forth above. Whitten's unlawful search claim against the individual-capacity defendants i s dismissed. Whitten's motion to strike (filing 49 ) is denied. Whitten's motion for sanctions (filing 50 ) is denied. Whitten's renewed motion to strike and for sanctions (filing 53 ) is denied. The defendants' answer to Whitten's remaining claims shall be filed on or before August 26, 2016. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER regarding pending motions.1) Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint, (Filing No. 42 ), is denied.2) Plaintiff's third amended complaint, (Filing No. 43 ), is stricken from the record. 3) Defendant's motion to dismiss the Filing No. 43 complaint, (Filing No. 44 ), is denied as moot.4) Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion to dismiss, (Filing No. 39 ), shall be filed on or before April 6, 2016, with any reply filed on or before April 13, 2016.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case to United States District Court Judge, (Filing No. 20 ), is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy e-mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 16 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave. For the reasons stated in my prior decision and recommendation, (Filing No. 13 ), the undersigned magistrate judge finds Plaintiff's claims against unknown and unnamed defenda nts should be dismissed with prejudice. As such, Plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint which still names these unknown defendants will be denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- This action may proceed to service of process. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Whitten a copy of the Complaint, a copy of this order, and two summons forms and two USM 285 forms for service of process on John Mar tin in his individual and official capacities. If requested to do so in this matter, the United States Marshal will serve all process in this case without prepayment of fees from Whitten. In making such a request, Whitten must complete the USM 285 forms and submit them to the clerk of the court, together with the completed summons forms. Without these documents, the United States Marshal will not serve process. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 10/19/2015: check for completion of service) Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copies mailed as directed)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the court to conduct an initial revie w of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
