Securities and Exchange Commission v. McGinn, Smith & Co, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: McGinn, Smith & Co, Inc., McGinn, Smith Advisors, LLC, McGinn, Smith Capital Holdings Corp., First Advisory Income Notes, LLC, First Excelsior Income Notes, LLC, First Independent Income Notes, LLC, Third Albany Income Notes, LLC, Timothy M. McGinn, David L. Smith and Lynn A. Smith
Case Number: 1:2010cv00457
Filed: April 20, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Albany
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Sharpe
Presiding Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1130 SUMMARY ORDER - ORDERED that the Ninth Motion, (Dkt. No. 1075), is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the Remar-Lex Claims, listed on Exhibit A to theNinth Motion, (Dkt. No. 1075, Attach. 12 at 4), are DISALLOWED; and it i s further ORDERED that the Rabinovich Claims, listed on the revised versionof Exhibit A to the Ninth Motion, (Dkt. No. 1097, Attach. 1 at 4), excluding claims marked as Individual Claim, are DISALLOWED; and it is further ORDERED that t he ADT Claims listed on Exhibit B to the NinthMotion, (Dkt. No. 1075, Attach. 12 at 5), are RECLASSIFIED to unsecuredclaims and are DISALLOWED; and it is further ORDERED that the HSK Claim, listed on Exhibit B to the NinthMotion , (Dkt. No. 1075, Attach. 12 at 5), is RECLASSIFIED to a secured claim to the extent of the value of the collateral and as an unsecured claim for any deficiency in accordance with the plan of distribution; and it is further ORDERED that the application of the preferential payment offset to reduce the distributions to preferred investors is APPROVED as set forth on Exhibit C-1 to the Ninth Motion, (Dkt. No. 1075, Attach. 12 at 6); and it is further ORDERED t hat the preferred investor paper claims listed on ExhibitC-2 to the Ninth Motion, (Dkt. No. 1075, Attach. 12 at 7), areDISALLOWED; and it is further ORDERED that each of the paper claims listed on Exhibits D-1, D-2,and D-3 to the Ninth Mot ion, (Dkt. No. 1075, Attach. 12 at 8-11), are DISALLOWED; and it is further ORDERED that the rights of the Receiver to object on any other basis to the claims of all investors or claimants is PRESERVED. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/7/2020. (jel, )
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1066 SUMMARY ORDER - That David Smith's motion to modify asset freeze to allow the release of certain property (Dkt. No. 1039) is DENIED. That Lynn Smith's letter motion dated May 9, 2019 presenting the same arguments as David Smith's motion (Dkt. No. 1054) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 9/4/2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(jel, )
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1043 SUMMARY ORDER - That, upon the third motion of William J. Brown, asReceiver, for an order disallowing certain claims (Dkt. No. 984); and noticeof the motion having been given to the Securities and ExchangeCommission, each of the brokers listed on Ex hibit A to the motion (Dkt. No.984, Attach. 2), Kathleen Lex, and Kimellen Lex, by first class mail, and allparties who have filed a Notice of Appearance in this action by ECF, andall creditors of the McGinn, Smith entities and other parties in inter est viathe Receiver's website, which notice is deemed good and sufficient notice;and the court having deemed that sufficient cause exists, the motion isGRANTED. That each of the claims listed on Exhibit A to the motion(Dkt. No. 984, Attach. 2) i s disallowed; and the rights of the Receiver toobject on any other basis to the claims of all investors or claimants isexpressly preserved. That Rabinovich's request for redaction (Dkt. No. 1040) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 3/6/2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(jel, )
October 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 904 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That the Rabinovich's letter motion to file a sur-reply (Dkt. No. 892) is DENIED. That the Receiver's motion for an order approving of his distribution plan and authorizing interim distributions (Dkt. No. 847) is GRANTED. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 10/31/2016. (jel, )
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 840 AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT TIMOTHY M. MCGINN: Amending the # 836 Judgment in favor of Securities and Exchange Commission against Timothy M. McGinn. Judgment amended to fix a monetary amount on page 6 previously listed as $11,668.132 and now updated to reflect the correct amount of $11,668,132. [Copy sent to pro se defendant Nancy McGinn via regular mail.] (mc)
June 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 837 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO LYNN A. SMITH, LAUREN T. SMITH, GEOFFREY R. SMITH AND NANCY MCGINN: in favor of Securities and Exchange Commission against Geoffrey R. Smith, Lauren T. Smith, Lynn A. Smith and Nancy McGinn. The Court, on March 30, 2015, having issued a Memorandum-Decision and Order (Dkt. 816) granting plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission's motion for summary judgment on the Eighth Claim for Relief as alleged in the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 334). The transfers noted in Se ction 1 of this Order were made in violation of § 276 of the New York Debtor and Creditor Law, are declared void and are hereby set aside. It is ORDERED that L. Smith, as one of the transferors of the fraudulent transfers listed in Section I(2) through I(8) in this Order, shall be jointly and severally liable, together with D. Smith, for the return all such fraudulently transferred assets, or their equivalent value, to the Receiver, subject to the offset in Section III. It is ORDERED that the transferees identified in Section I in the Order shall be jointly and severally liable with D. Smith and L. Smith for the return of all assets fraudulently conveyed to them, or their equivalent value, to the Receiver, William J. Brown, Esq. as no ted herein. It is ORDERED that the Receiver shall apply all proceeds of all payments and transfers to him pursuant to this Final Judgment, including all proceeds of the sale of the Sacandaga Lake Property, the Niskayuna Property and the Vero Beach Pr operty, and the assets in the Smith Trust and the BOA Account, to the Distribution Fund for the benefit of the defrauded investors. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe. [Copy served upon pro se defendant Nancy McGinn via certified and regular mail.] (mc)
March 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 816 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That the remainder of the SEC's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 708, Attach. 1 at 14-29, 32-40) is GRANTED. That the SEC's requests for disgorgement of profits in the amount of $87,433,218 and prej udgment interest in the amount of $11,668,132 are GRANTED. That $99,101,350 - the total amount of disgorged profits plus prejudgment interest - be returned to defrauded investors. That the following assets may be applied in order to satis fy the disgorgement order: (1) the Stock Account; (2) the Smith Vero Beach Home; (3) the Checking Account; and (4) the Smith Trust. That the Clerk defer entering judgment as against the Four Funds, MS & Co., MS Advisors, and MS Capital pending furth er direct from the court. That Brown, on behalf of the Four Funds, may consent to entry of judgment on the SEC's fifth and sixth causes of action, and is directed to file his consent with the court within fourteen (14) days of this Memorandum-De csiion and Order. That Brown is further directed to inform the court, in writing, once the funds have been distributed to investors and he is ready to close the receivership, so that the court may enter judgment. That L. Smith's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 696) is DENIED as moot. That the Smith Trust, L.T. Smith, and G. Smith's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 704) is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 3/30/2015. (jel, )
February 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 807 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - ORDERED that the SEC's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: GRANTED with respect to the SEC's first cause of action alleging violations of § 17(a) of the S ecurities Act, as against MS & Co., MS Advisors, MS Capital, McGinn, and Smith; GRANTED with respect to the SEC's second cause of action alleging violations of § 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as against MS & C o., MS Advisors, MS Capital, McGinn, and Smith; GRANTED with respect to the SEC's third cause of action alleging violations of § 15(c)(1) of the Exchange Act as against MS & Co., and aiding and abetting violations of § 15(c) (1) as against McGinn and Smith; GRANTED with respect to the SEC's fourth cause of action alleging violations of the Advisors Act as against MS & Co., MS Advisors, McGinn, and Smith; GRANTED with respect to the SEC's si xth cause of action alleging violations of §§ 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act as against MS & Co., MS Capital, McGinn, and Smith; GRANTED with respect to the SEC's request for a permanent injunction barring McGinn and Sm ith from committing future violations of §§ 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act, § 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, § 15(c)(1) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-3 thereunder, and § 7; 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act, and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder; and GRANTED with respect to the SEC's request for an order barring McGinn from serving as an officer or director of a public company; and DENIED w ith respect to the SEC's request for civil penalties; and it is further; ORDERED that the court reserves judgment on the SEC's request for disgorgement of profits, only as to the appropriate amount. If the SEC wishes to pursue this theor y, consistent with this Memorandum-Decision and Order, the SEC must provide a reasonable approximation of the profits causally connected to the violations within SEVEN (7) DAYS from the issuance of this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Smith may respo nd within SEVEN (7) DAYS after the SEC files its submission; and it is further; ORDERED that the court reserves judgment on the remainder of the SEC's motion; and it is further ORDERED that, within SEVEN (7) DAYS of this Memorandum-Dec ision and Order, the SEC inform the court whether it has abandoned and/or withdrawn its fifth cause of action and sixth cause of action insofar as it is alleged against the Four Funds, or whether it seeks a trial on those claims; and it is further ORDERED that McGinn and Smith are enjoined from committing future violations of §§ 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act, § 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, § 15(c)(1) of the Exchange Act, a nd Rule 10b-3 thereunder, and §§ 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act, and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder; and it is further ORDERED that McGinn is permanently and unconditionally barred from acting as an officer or director of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78l or that is required to file reports pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78o(d). Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 2/17/2015. (jel, )
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 806 ORDER - ORDERED that Timothy McGinn and Nancy McGinn either notify the court and opposing counsel of their intention not to respond to the SEC's motion or file their response(s) within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of this Orders filing date; and it is further ORDERED that if Timothy McGinn and/or Nancy McGinn file(s) a response, the SEC may file a reply within SEVEN (7) DAYS from the filing of the response(s). Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 12/12/2014. (jel, )
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 684 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 660 Motion to Amend Documentation. It is hereby ORDERED that the Trust's motion to amend its documentation to delete the provisions authorizing the Trust to enter into the private annuity agreement with David and Lynn Smith is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 2/21/2014. (dpk)
November 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 647 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER re 604 Status Report filed by William J Brown. It is ORDERED that the Receiver may proceed with the sale of the Sacandaga Lake Property pursuant to the report filed with the court (Dkt. No. 604). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 11/22/2013. (lah)
February 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 562 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER re 561 Amended Fifth Application for Attorney's Fees and Costs filed by David L. Smith. ORDERED that Dreyer Boyajian LLP's Fifth Amended Application for compensation for legal services rendered between 1/1/2 013 and 1/31/2013 in the amount of $92,137.50 is approved. ORDERED that the application by Dreyer Boyajian LLP for reimbursement of costs expended between 1/1/2013 and 1/31/2013 in the amount of $3,502.09 is approved. ORDERED that Dreyer Boyajian LLP may make further applications as deemed appropriate. ORDERED that Dreyer Boyajian LLP is authorized to make the payments allowed pursuant to this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 2/19/2013. (dpk)
January 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 557 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER re 556 Sealed Document filed by David L. Smith. It is hereby ORDERED, that Dreyer Boyajian LLP's Fourth Application for compensation for legal services rendered between 12/1/2012 and 12/31/2012 in the amount of & #036;66,717.50 is approved. ORDERED that the application by Dreyer Boyajian LLP for reimbursement of costs expended between 12/1/2012 and 12/31/2012 in the amount of $900.89 is approved. ORDERED that Dreyer Boyajin LLP may make further applications as deemed appropriate. ORDERED that Dreyer Boyajian LLP is authorized to make the payments allowed pursuant to this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 1/8/2013. (dpk)
October 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 539 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER granting 538 Sealed Application. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 10/15/2012. (dpk)
April 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 479 ORDER regarding 453 the motion of William J. Brown, as Receiver, for an Order Approving the Sale and Bidding Procedures with Respect to the Sale of Certain Alarm System Monitoring Accounts. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is APPROVED. IT IS FU RTHER ORDERED that the Receiver's interests in the Accounts and assets on the Rider to the APA shall be sold and assigned to the Purchaser without recourse, representation or warranty and free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances and oth er interests, with such liens and claims, if any, attaching to the net proceeds of sale. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Receiver is authorized to pay the break-up fee of $60,000.00 to the stalking horse bidder, Alarm Services, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Homer on 4/4/2012. (mab)
May 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 321 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER, that Lynn Smith's 224 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. That the Trust, Geoffrey Smith, and Lauren Smith's 283 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part as to the fraudulent conveyance claims against Lauren Smith a nd Geoffrey Smith in his individual capacity. That the Trust, Geoffrey Smith, and Lauren Smith's 283 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in part as to the fraudulent conveyance claim against the Trust. That the SEC is GRANTED limited leave to re-ame nd its complaint, in full compliance with the terms of this Order, within thirty (30) days from the date of the filing of this Order, after which Geoffrey Smith and Lauren Smith shall respond to the complaint as permitted under the Federal Rules of C ivil Procedure. That if the SEC fails to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of the filing of this Order, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment dismissing Geoffrey Smith and Lauren Smith from this action without further order of the court. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 5/6/2011. (jel, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. McGinn, Smith & Co, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: David P. Stoelting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McGinn, Smith & Co, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McGinn, Smith Advisors, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McGinn, Smith Capital Holdings Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Advisory Income Notes, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Excelsior Income Notes, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Independent Income Notes, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Third Albany Income Notes, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy M. McGinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David L. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lynn A. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?