Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC
Defendant:
David L. Smith and Pavel V. Tolstov
USA v. David Smith
as 22-1645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID L. SMITH
United States Securities and E v. McGinn, Smith & Company, Incor
as 22-746
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
McGinn, Smith & Company, Incorporated, McGinn, Smith Advisors, LLC, McGinn, Smith Capital Holdings Corporation and others
Intervenor:
United States Attorney's Office of the Northern District of New York
Defendant / Appellant:
David L. Smith
Smith v. Boyle
as 5:2022ct03090
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv08026
Petitioner:
David L Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01673
Defendant:
ROY A. COOPER III, LEXIS PUBLISHING, NANCY S. NASH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. County of Pender et al
as 5:2020ct03347
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
County of Pender and Bryan K. Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020ct03301
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle, Vince M. Rozier, Jr., Joshua Stein and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dever et al
as 5:2020ct03285
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, James C. Dever, III and Bryan K. Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv59198
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
