Johnson v. State Financial Solutions
Plaintiff: Mark Johnson
Defendant: State Financial Solutions
Case Number: 1:2011cv01518
Filed: December 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Albany
Presiding Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Presiding Judge: David R. Homer
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 25 Report and Recommendations: The Court hereby ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Hummel's Report-Recommendation and Order is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and the Court furth er ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED; and the Court furtherORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in Defendant's favor and close this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff by regular mail. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 5/22/13. (ban)
May 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER rejecting 8 Report and Recommendations: ORDERED, that plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; and it is further ORDERED, that upon receipt from plaintiff of the documents required for service the Cler k shall issue a summons, and forward it together with a copy of the complaint, to the United States Marshal for service on defendant without the payment of fees. ORDERED, that a formal response to the Complaint be filed by the Defendants as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure subsequent to service of process on the Defendants; and it is further ORDERED, that any paper sent by a party to the Court or the Clerk shall be accompanied by a certificate setting forth the date a true an d correct copy of it was mailed to all opposing parties or their counsel. Any letter or other document received by the Clerk or the Court which does not include a certificate of service which clearly states that an identical copy was served upon all opposing parties or their attorneys is to be returned, without processing, by the Clerk. Plaintiff shall also comply with any requests by the Clerk's Office for any documents that are necessary to maintain this action; and it is further ORDERED, that all motions shall comply with the Local Rules of Practice of the Northern District; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order and General Order 25 on Plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 5/14/12. (ban)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. State Financial Solutions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Financial Solutions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?