Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05788
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Foley et al v. Strickland et al
as 4:2026cv03939
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Spivey Foley, Deborah Spivey and Byron Spivey
Defendant:
Brandon Strickland, Alan Jones, Damon Vescovi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Liability of Carriers Under Receipts and Bills of Lading
Johnson et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv01685
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson and Nicole Johnson
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Alex Jones and Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson-Crestwell v. Williams
as 1:2026cv01900
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson-Crestwell
Defendant:
Henry Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2026cv00401
Plaintiff:
Jon Mark Johnson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03843
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv03854
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Shan Trucking LLC et al
as 5:2026cv01078
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Shan Trucking LLC and Albert Rwabusisoni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
