WILLIAMS v. GUILFORD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES et al
JOSEPH THOMAS WILLIAMS |
GUILFORD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, RANDY PARKER, RAE MARIE SMITH, MITCHELL JOHNSON, JEAN JACKSON, ADRIENNE FRIDDLE, BEVERLY NIPPER, ANGELA DAWN TEVEPAUGH, AARON SMITH, ELIZABETH CLODFELTER and NATASHA POWELL |
1:2014cv00843 |
October 6, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Guilford |
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
JOE L. WEBSTER |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 7/13/2015; that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 20 ) be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Williams' claims against all Individual Defendants except Parker are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Williams' claims against Parker in his individual capacity are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Williams' claims against the GTCC Board of Trustees are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for insufficient service of p rocess; Williams' claims for punitive damages are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Williams' claims for hostile work environment are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Williams' claims for wrongful discharge are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and Williams' claims for retaliation under Title VII and the ADEA are permitted to proceed at this stage. FURTHER that this court's earlier stay of discovery (Doc. 31 ) is LIFTED. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.