Cases 1 - 10 of 58
JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01649
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MITCHELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lee Johnson v. McKinney, et al
as 24-11103
Plaintiff:
LEE MITCHELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
MCKINNEY, PROCK, TYRE and others
Lee Johnson v. McKinney, et al
as 24-10898
Plaintiff:
LEE MITCHELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
MCKINNEY, PROCK, TYRE and others
Johnson v. Patterson et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Donovan Mitchell Johnson
Defendant:
Matthew Patterson and Corey Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MCKINNEY et al
as 4:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
LEE MITCHELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
MCKINNEY, PROCK, TYRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Hayes v. Randy Watson, et al
as 22-2273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Hayes
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Watson, Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction, Claudia Harris, Deputy Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction, Mitchell Johnson, Jr., Captain, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Johnson v. Walker et al
as 9:2022cv80881
Plaintiff:
Lee Mitchell Johnson
Defendant:
Walker and Henley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06265
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MITCHELL JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
Albert Mitchell Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Burgess et al v. Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Victoria Ann Burgess, Elizabeth F Johnson, Clark Walker Johnson and others
Defendant:
Howard Mitchell Johnson, HMJMOJ LLC, MOJ/HMJ LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
