BRYANT et al v. WOODALL et al
| AMY BRYANT, M.D., BEVERLY GRAY, MD, ELIZABETH DEANS, MD and PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC |
| JIM WOODALL, ROGER ECHOLS, ELEANOR E. GREENE and RICK BRAJER |
| 1:2016cv01368 |
| November 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Durham |
| UNASSIGNED |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 03/25/2019, that the Memorandum Opinion, Order, and Recommendation, (Doc. 71 ), is NOT ADOPTED for the reasons stated herein. FURTHER that Pla intiffs' Second Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 44 ), is GRANTED. FURTHER that N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-45.1(a) is hereby declared unconstitutional and the enforcement of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-45.1(a) is ENJOINED only to the extent th at N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1445.1(a) prohibits any pre-viability abortions. FURTHER that the above order enjoining enforcement of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1445.1(a) is STAYED for a period of sixty (60) days from the date hereof. A judgment for Plaintiffs shall be entered upon the expiration of the stay described above. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATIONOF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 08/24/2018, that the Strike Motion (Docket Entry 69 ) is DENIED without prejudice to the filing , on or before September 4, 2018, of a motion that appropriately addresses the identified defects in the Strike Motion; FURTHER that the Clerk shall refer any such motion to the undersigned or, in the absence of such motion, the Clerk shall remo ve the access restrictions on the attachments to Docket Entry 53 (i.e., Docket Entries 53 -1 through 53 -5); RECOMMENDED that the Court deny the Summary Judgment Motion (Docket Entry 44 ) and dismiss this action for want ofsubject-matter jurisdiction due to Plaintiffs' lack of standing.(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 4/7/2017, that Defendants' Rule 56(d) Motion (Docket Entry 21 ) is GRANTED. Defendants may conduct discovery until June 6, 2017, regarding: (1) whether any fetuses between 20 and 26 weeks in North Carolina meet the definition of "viable" adopted by the Supreme Court, and, if so, how many and when; (2) whether fetuses between 20 and 26 weeks experience pain and, if so, when and to what degree; (3) whether ab ortions of fetuses between 20 and 26 weeks pose any greater health risks to pregnant women than abortions of fetuses before 20 weeks and, if so, when and to what degree; and (4) Plaintiffs' standing to bring this action. Defendants shall file any response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 13 ) by July 6, 2017. (Daniel, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
