Cases
EARLS v. NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00734
Plaintiff: ANITA S. EARLS
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, THE, THE HONORABLE CHRIS DILLON, THE HONORABLE DAWN M. LAYTON and others
Petitioner: LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC et al v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff: PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC and Dr. BEVERLY GRAY, MD
Defendant: JOSHUA STEIN, TODD M. WILLIAMS, JIM O'NEILL and others
Intervenor Defendant: PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Alan Wilson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1369
Defendant: EDWARD SIMMER, in his official capacity as Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, SCARLETT A. WILSON, in her official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 9th Judicial Circuit, CHRISTOPHER C. WRIGHT, in his official capacity as a Member of the South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: GREENVILLE WOMEN'S CLINIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff, PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff and TERRY L. BUFFKIN, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients
Intervenor: HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of South Carolina and JAMES H. LUCAS, a/k/a Jay, in his official capacity as Speaker of the South Carolina House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM WALTER WILKINS, III, in his official capacity as Solicitor for South Carolina's 13th Judicial Circuit and ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et al v. Wilson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00508
Defendant: Theresa Mills-Floyd, Anne G. Cook, Richard Howell and others
Plaintiff: Terry L. Buffkin, Planned Parenthood South Atlantic and Greenville Women's Clinic
Intervenor: James H. Lucas, Jay and Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Planned Parenthood v. Joshua Baker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1043
Plaintiff / Appellee: JULIE EDWARDS, on her behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated and PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC
Defendant / Appellant: JOSHUA BAKER, in his official capacity as Director, South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services
Amy Bryant v. Jim Woodall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1685
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMY BRYANT, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, ELIZABETH DEANS, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, BEVERLY GRAY, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant / Appellant: JIM WOODALL, In his official capacity as District Attorney ("DA") for Prosecutorial District ("PD") 15B, ELEANOR E. GREENE, In her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board, MANDY K. COHEN, In her official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services; and their employees, agents, and successors and others
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. Baker
as 2:2018cv02078
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood South Atlantic and Julie Edwards
Defendant: Joshua Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
BRYANT et al v. WOODALL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01368
Plaintiff: AMY BRYANT, M.D. , BEVERLY GRAY, MD , ELIZABETH DEANS, MD and others
Defendant: JIM WOODALL , ROGER ECHOLS , ELEANOR E. GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?