Zickes v. Cuyahoga County et al
| Joseph Zickes |
| Cuyahoga County, Cuyahoga County Executive, Bryan Smith, Michael Carroll and Lucy Rodriguez |
| 1:2015cv01865 |
| September 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/16/16. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants defendant Bryan Smith's motion to exclude testimony, denies plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and grants defendants' motions for summary judgment. (Related Docs. 51 , 52 , 53 , and 57 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
55
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/25/16 denying as moot defendants' motion to compel and for continuance. (Related Doc. 50 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
36
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/10/16 granting in part and denying in part the motion for judgment on the pleadings of defendants Cuyahoga County, Cuyahoga County Executive, Michael Carroll and Bryan Smith for the reasons se t forth in this order. The Court dismisses defendants Cuyahoga County and Cuyahoga Executive as well as claims for relief as to intentional infliction of emotional distress, and under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment. (Related Doc. 20 ) (D,MA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
