Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Bowman et al v. Unknown et al
as 2:2025cv00002
Defendant:
Unknown Schwak, Unknown Martin, Unknown Tulton and others
Plaintiff:
Jamerick Beckford, Bryan Smith, Darrin Grayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Englebright et al v. Buhl et al
as 4:2024cv00552
Defendant:
Kody Fisher, Shannon Buhl, Bryan Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Francis AL Englebright and Rosella Englebright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07341
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Kennedy v. City of Natchez, Mississippi et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Defendant:
Officer Bryan Smith, Natchez Police Department and City of Natchez, Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Dominique Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jackson v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Brooke Jackson
Defendant:
Michael Bryan Smith, Heyl Truck Lines, Inc. and Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE SMITH and BRYAN SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC, KENVUE, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30894
Plaintiff:
BRYAN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25038
Plaintiff:
BRYAN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
