Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Jackson v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Brooke Jackson
Defendant:
Michael Bryan Smith, Heyl Truck Lines, Inc. and Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE SMITH and BRYAN SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC, KENVUE, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30894
Plaintiff:
BRYAN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25038
Plaintiff:
BRYAN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
U-Haul Co of Arkansas v. Hyatt et al
as 4:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
U-Haul Co of Arkansas
Defendant:
William Hyatt, Cameron Mutual Insurance Company, Santoshi Krupa LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
SPONHOLZ-SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv14821
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Sponholz-Smith and Bryan Smith
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC, KENVUE, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tony Smith v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6835
Petitioner / Appellant:
TONY BRYAN SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
Tony Smith v. Unknown
as 23-6207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY BRYAN SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
