USA v. $70,150 in US Currency, et al
| United States of America |
| Seventy Thousand One Hundred Fifty Dollars in United States Currency ($70,150.00), Contents of Charles Schwab Brokerage Account Number 5059-2055, Contents of Huntington National Bank Premier Savings Account Number 04652021815, Contents of Fifth Third Bank Maxsaver Account Number 41-533612, Contents of Sharefax Credit Union Savings Account Number 75316, Contents of Sharefax Credit Union Savings Account, Number 71496, Huntington National Bank Official Check Number 100229431 in the Amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), PNC Bank Cashier's Check Number 4476374 in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), Fifth Third BAnk Official Check Number 2171174 in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), One 1990 Lexus LS400 and One 1984 Marinette 32' Flybridge Sedan, Official Number 678494 |
| Nico Capurro |
| 1:2002cv00874 |
| October 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| S Arthur Spiegel |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
OPINION AND ORDER granting 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 53 Motion to Strike Hearsay Statements. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 10/27/2009. (km1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
