Miami Valley Paper LLC v. Lebbing Engineering & Consulting GMBH
| 1:2005cv00702 |
| October 28, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| S Arthur Spiegel |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 44 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: the Court DENIES the parties motions in regards to their respective breach of contract claims, DENIES Defendants motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs breach of warranty claims, and DENIES Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on Defendants claim for reformation due to mutual mista ke. The Court GRANTS Defendants motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs negligent misrepresentation, fraudulent inducement, and unjust enrichment claims, and GRANTS Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on Defendants claim for fraudulent inducement. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 3/26/2009. (km1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miami Valley Paper LLC v. Lebbing Engineering & Consulting GMBH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
