Denker v. Procter & Gamble Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Denker v. Procter & Gamble Company

Denker v. Procter & Gamble Company

Plaintiff:	Harry Denker
Defendant:	Procter & Gamble Company
Case Number:	1:2009cv00774
Filed:	October 23, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	HAMILTON
Presiding Judge:	Herman J. Weber
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 7, 2013	Filing 64 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Court having been advised by Magistrate Judge J. Gregory Wehrman that this case has successfully mediated and settled in the Courts presence; It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, prov ided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement. The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/7/2013. (mr1)
January 2, 2013	Filing 43 STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/2/2013. (mr1)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 7, 2013

Filing 64 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Court having been advised by Magistrate Judge J. Gregory Wehrman that this case has successfully mediated and settled in the Courts presence; It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, prov ided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Also, if desired, the parties may timely move to substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement. The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/7/2013. (mr1)

January 2, 2013

Filing 43 STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/2/2013. (mr1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Denker v. Procter & Gamble Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harry Denker
Represented By:	Glenn Virgil Whitaker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Procter & Gamble Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?