Logan et al v. Sycamore Community School Board of Education et al
| Cynthia A. Logan and Albert M. Logan |
| Sycamore Community School Board of Education, Paul Payne, City of Montgomery Ohio, Sarah Jane Ramsey, A. R., Courtney Richardson, Ryan Salyers and Emily Stachler |
| 1:2009cv00885 |
| December 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Timothy S Hogan |
| S Arthur Spiegel |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 79 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, such that Plaintiffs' federal claims remain, while their state law claim is dismissed. The Court further sets this matter for a final pretrial conference on 7/17/2012 at 2:00 PM and for a four-day jury trial to commence on 8/14/2012, on an on-deck basis. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 6/5/2012. (km1)
|
|
Filing
70
OPINION AND ORDER granting 20 56 Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants City of Montgomery and Officer Paul Payne; granting 57 Plaintiffs' Motion for Additional Discovery, to the extent that discovery may proceed as to Sycamore Community School board of Education. The Court further sets this matter for a status conference on 3/1/2011 at 3:30 PM, at which time it will determine with the remaining parties an appropriate schedule. Signed by Judge S Arthur Spiegel on 2/3/2011. (km1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
