Boeing v. FSN, Inc.

Plaintiff: David J. Boeing
Defendant: FSN, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00310
Filed: May 8, 2013
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: BUTLER
Presiding Judge: Herman J. Weber
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 13, 2013 4 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: Preliminary Pretrial Conference scheduled for August 23, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. Counsel to file Joint Litigation Plan by August 12, 2013. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 5/13/2013. (eb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boeing v. FSN, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David J. Boeing
Represented By: Theodore C Copetas
Represented By: David A Eberly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FSN, Inc.
Represented By: Michael A Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.