Jones v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Jones v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Jones v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Elwood H Jones
Respondent:	Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Case Number:	1:2014cv00440
Filed:	May 27, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	HAMILTON
Presiding Judge:	Norah McCann King
Presiding Judge:	Algenon L. Marbley
Nature of Suit:	Death Penalty
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 16, 2015	Filing 19 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION - This Supplemental Memorandum Opinion is neither an order under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(a) nor a report and recommendations under § 636(b)(1)(B). The Petitioner's Objections to the Transfer Order are therefore ripe for Judge Roses consideration. No objection period applies under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and neither party may file additional argument without permission of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/16/2015. (kpf1)
March 12, 2015	Filing 18 RECOMMITTAL ORDER -This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections 16 to the Magistrate Judge's Order 13 . As permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Warden has filed a Response to those Objections 17 . The District Judge has pre liminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 3-12-2015. (de)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 16, 2015

Filing 19 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION - This Supplemental Memorandum Opinion is neither an order under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(a) nor a report and recommendations under § 636(b)(1)(B). The Petitioner's Objections to the Transfer Order are therefore ripe for Judge Roses consideration. No objection period applies under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and neither party may file additional argument without permission of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/16/2015. (kpf1)

March 12, 2015

Filing 18 RECOMMITTAL ORDER -This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections 16 to the Magistrate Judge's Order 13 . As permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the Warden has filed a Response to those Objections 17 . The District Judge has pre liminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 3-12-2015. (de)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Elwood H Jones
Represented By:	Erin Gallagher Barnhart
Represented By:	Carol Ann Wright
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Represented By:	Stephen E. Maher
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?