Cloke v. Local Union #1090 et al
Alfred K Cloke, III |
Local Union #1090, Douglas McCarron and United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America |
1:2014cv00773 |
October 1, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Cincinnati Office |
CLERMONT |
Stephanie K. Bowman |
S Arthur Spiegel |
Labor: Other |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER ADOPTING 63 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Accordingly, the pending motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint with prejudice filed by Defendant Local Union 1090(Doc. 54), by Defendant United Brotherhood ofCarpenters and Joiners of America (Doc. 51), and by Defendant Indiana/Kentucky/Ohio Regional Council of Carpenters (Doc. 59) are GRANTED. This case is hereby TERMINATED from the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 9/11/2018. (jlw) |
Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 4 Report and Recommendations:this action is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim for relief. It is further ORDERED that the Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a) that a n appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith, therefore denying plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 3/9/2015. (jlw1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.