Robinson v. Rueggeberg et al
| Monique Robinson |
| Jason Rueggeberg and Kenwood Family Chiropractic |
| 1:2015cv00082 |
| February 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 19 Report and Recommendation granting 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; claims against Dr. Jason Rueggeberg are dismissed; claims against Kenwood Family Chiropractic shall proceed. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 9/1/15. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
19
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 Defendant Dr. Jason Rueggeberg's Motion to Dismiss. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Defendant's motion to dismiss 11 be GRANTED, with all claims brought against Defendant Dr. Jason Rueggeberg to be DISMISSED WI TH PREJUDICE. Only the claims against Plaintiff's employer, Kenwood Family Chiropractic, should proceed. Objections to R&R due by 8/24/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 8/6/2015. (km) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
