Brookbank v. Anthem Life Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Brookbank v. Anthem Life Insurance Company

Brookbank v. Anthem Life Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Elizabeth Brookbank
Defendant:	Anthem Life Insurance Company
Case Number:	1:2015cv00165
Filed:	March 6, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	BUTLER
Presiding Judge:	Susan J. Dlott
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Litkovitz
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 16, 2016	Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants motion for judgment on the administrative record (Doc. 22) isGRANTED. Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the administrative record (Doc. 23) is DENIED.Plaintiffs state law claims are DISMISSED on preemption grounds and judgment is entered infavor of defendant and against plaintiff on the claim to recover benefits under ERISA.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 5/16/2016. (jlw)
April 20, 2016	Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant's 22 MOTION for judgment on the administrative record be Granted. Plaintiff's 23 MOTION for judgment on the administrative record be Denied. Plaintiff's state law claims be Dismissed on preemption grounds and judgment be entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff on the claim to recover benefits under ERISA. Objections to R&R due by 5/9/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/20/2016. (art)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 16, 2016

Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants motion for judgment on the administrative record (Doc. 22) isGRANTED. Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the administrative record (Doc. 23) is DENIED.Plaintiffs state law claims are DISMISSED on preemption grounds and judgment is entered infavor of defendant and against plaintiff on the claim to recover benefits under ERISA.. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 5/16/2016. (jlw)

April 20, 2016

Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendant's 22 MOTION for judgment on the administrative record be Granted. Plaintiff's 23 MOTION for judgment on the administrative record be Denied. Plaintiff's state law claims be Dismissed on preemption grounds and judgment be entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff on the claim to recover benefits under ERISA. Objections to R&R due by 5/9/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 4/20/2016. (art)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brookbank v. Anthem Life Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Brookbank
Represented By:	David Theodore Davidson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Anthem Life Insurance Company
Represented By:	Kent Allen Britt
Represented By:	Daniel C. Morgenstern
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?