Premoh v. Cincinnati City of et al
| Kofi N. Premoh |
| Cincinnati City of, Albert M. Hartung, Charlie Crawford and Richard Schriewer |
| 1:2015cv00265 |
| April 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Sandra S Beckwith |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 34 granting 16 Motion to Dismiss;The claims against defendant Hartung in his individual capacity are DISMISSED. That the motion to dismiss by defendants Crawford, Schriewer, and the City of Cincinnati i s GRANTED. The claims against defendants Crawford, Schriewer, and the City of Cincinnati under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are DISMISSED. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) over plaintiffs claims br ought under state law against defendants Crawford, Schriewer, and the City of Cincinnati. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 6/616. (mb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
34
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the claims against defendant Hartung (deceased) in his individual capacity be Dismissed pursuant to FRCP 25(a)(1); the 16 MOTION to Dismiss by defendants Crawford, Schriewer and the City of Cincinnati be Granted; the claims against defendants Crawford, Schriewer and the City of Cincinnati under 42 USC 1983 be Dismiss for failure to state a claim to relief. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims brought under sta te law against defendants Crawford, Schriewer and the City of Cincinnati. Objections to R&R due by 5/31/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/13/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER denying 2 Motion for preliminary injunction; adopting Report and Recommendation 29 . Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 4/18/16. (mb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
29
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 2 MOTION Verified Petition for Temporary Injunction be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 2/22/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 2/4/2016. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER denying 5 Report and Recommendation. The clerk is to correctly docket plaintiff's motion (doc. 2) as a verified motion for preliminary injunction. Signed by Judge Sandra S Beckwith on 6/8/15. (mb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that plaintiff's 2 MOTION Temporary Restraining Orderr be Denied. Objections to R&R due by 5/21/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/4/2015. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
