Lloyd v. The Procter & Gamble Disability Benefit Plan
| Mark Lloyd |
| The Procter & Gamble Disability Benefit Plan, The Procter & Gamble Long Term Disability Allowance Policy Plan and The Procter & Gamble Disability Committee |
| 1:2018cv00032 |
| January 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| HAMILTON |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD (DOC. 28 ), GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE RECORD (DOC. 29 ), ORDERING THE PAYMENT OF PARTIAL DISABILITY PAYMENTS FROM JANUARY 16, 2017 TH ROUGH JANUARY 28, 2017, AND TERMINATING ACTION: The Court DENIES Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. 28 ) and GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. 29 ). Specifically, the Court upholds the denial of Plaintiff's December 1, 2015 application for benefits but reverses the denial of Plaintiff's January 27, 2017 application for benefits as arbitrary and capricious. The Court ORDERS that Defendants pay to Plaintiff partial disability benefits for the period from January 16, 2017 through January 28, 2017. This case shall be TERMINATED on the Courts docket. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 12/03/2020. (kaf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
