Inhalation Plastics, Inc. v. Medex Cardio-Pulmonary, Inc.
Plaintiff: Inhalation Plastics, Inc.
Defendant: Medex Cardio-Pulmonary, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2007cv00116
Filed: February 15, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King
Presiding Judge: George C Smith
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 412 Agreed Entry resolving Notice of Attorney Lien signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 6/22/20. (sem)
December 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 358 ORDER adopting 357 the Report and Recommendation; Defendant's motion for attorneys' fees and taxation of costs is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as prematurely filed. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 12/20/16. (jk)
December 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 357 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 332 MOTION for Attorney Fees. It is recommended that the Motion be DENIED without prejudice as prematurely filed. Objections to R&R due by 12/19/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 12/1/2016. (pes)
June 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 262 ORDER: the parties participated in a mediation with Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel; the parties are too far apart for meaningful negotiations; the parties are ready for trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 6/18/13. (sh1)
May 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 261 ORDER: Mediation set for 6/17/13 at 10:00 before Magistrate Judge Mark R Abel in room 218. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 5/31/13. (sh1)
May 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 260 OPINION AND ORDER denying 254 motion to reopen discovery and for leave to filea motion for reconsideration of the Courts summary judgment ruling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 5/06/13. (rew)
March 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 251 ORDER granting 206 Motion ; granting 208 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 217 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 218 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 219 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 3-13-13. (ga)
August 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 236 OPINION AND ORDER granting 163 MOTION for Determination that Documents Produced by Medex Are Not Subject to Privilege by Plaintiff Inhalation Plastics, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/28/12. (rew)
February 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 197 OPINION AND ORDER denying 189 Motion for request for a telephone conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 2/29/12. (rew)
January 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 184 ORDER finding as moot 179 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim; and GRANTING 181 Motion for leave to file third amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 1/03/12. (rew)
December 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER : Plaintiff is GRANTED seven (7) days from the date of this Order to respond to re 179 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Medex Cardio-Pulmonary, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 12/29/11. (rew)
June 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER denying 121 Motion to Dismiss; denying 122 Motion to Dismiss; denying 137 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 6-8-11. (ga)
May 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 142 ORDER in reference to telephone conference held on 5/04/11. The Court will conduct another conference with counsel on June 21, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. Counsel shall call the Court, after consolidating their separate calls, at 614.719.3390 Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 5/04/11. (rew) Modified text on 5/4/2011 (rew1).
November 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 11-17-10. (ga)
October 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Granted 97 MOTION for Leave to File Third Party Complaint filed by Medex Cardio-Pulmonary, Inc. Defendant must file its Amended Answer, joining the Levines under Rule 13(h), within seve n (7) days of the date of this Order. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendants Counterclaim, Doc. No. 99, be DENIED.( Objections to R&R due by 11/15/2010) Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 10/28/10. (rew)
April 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 83 OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs Renewed Motion to Compel, Doc. No.[ 79], is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Renewed Motion to Compel Timely Filed, Doc. No. 80, is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 4/12/10. (rew)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Inhalation Plastics, Inc. v. Medex Cardio-Pulmonary, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Inhalation Plastics, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew David Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medex Cardio-Pulmonary, Inc.
Represented By: Kevin Robert McDermott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?