Hupp et al v. Switzerland of Ohio Local School District et al
| Jaqueline V. Hupp and Timothy L. Hupp |
| Switzerland of Ohio Local School District and John/Jane Doe |
| 2:2007cv00628 |
| July 5, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| MONROE |
| Norah McCann King |
| George C Smith |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
JUDGMENT is entered pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed 12/11/2012. This case is closed. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER considering Plaintiffs' Motion to Appeal and Consolidate and Amended Motion to Appeal and Consolidate ( 93 and 94 ) as motions to reactivate this case pursuant to the Court's Order of 06/10/09 and GRANTS these motions. Briefing scheduled is outlined in the Order. The Clerk is directed to administratively reopen this case. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 02/08/2011. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
92
OPINION AND ORDER remanding case to Ohio Department of Education, Case No. SE-1870-2006. This case is ADMINISTRATIVELY STAYED. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 06/10/09. (dh)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER changing location of Settlement Conference scheduled for 3/10/09 at 11:00 am to the Court of Common Pleas in Belmont County, Ohio. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 03/03/09. (dh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
