Kehoe Component Sales, Inc v. Best Lighting Products, Inc
| Kehoe Component Sales, Inc |
| Best Lighting Products, Inc |
| 2:2008cv00752 |
| August 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Contract: Other Office |
| LICKING |
| James L Graham |
| Terence P Kemp |
| Defendant |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
OPINION AND ORDER denying 103 104 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Supplement Disclosure to Add Additional Fact and/or Expert Witness in case 2:10-cv-00789-EAS-TPK. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 07/25/2013. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00752-EAS-TPK, 2:10-cv-00789-EAS-TPK (dh1)
|
|
Filing
135
OPINION AND ORDER denying (54),(66) Defendant/Counter-Claimant Best Lighting Products, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (64) is granted in part and denied in part subject to the conditions outlin ed in this Opinion and Order. Plaintiffs' Complaint in Case No. 2:10-cv-789 is dismissed without prejudice subject to the conditions outlined in this Opinion and Order. The Clerk is directed to strike the Declaration of James J. Hooley [72-1]. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 03/19/2013. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00752-EAS-TPK, 2:10-cv-00789-EAS-TPK (dh1)
|
|
Filing
132
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 123 Motion for Attorney Fees in case 2:08-cv-00752-EAS-TPK & (32) Motion for Attorney Fees in case 2:10-cv-00789-EAS-TPK. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 1/13/2012. Associated Cases: 2:08-cv-00752-EAS-TPK, 2:10-cv-00789-EAS-TPK (kk2)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER granting 78 (and #7 in case no 2:10-cv-789) Motion to Consolidate Cases. The cases are consolidated for all discovery and pretrial purposes; denying as moot 79 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying as moot [102 ] Emergency Motion to Exclude Witnesses and Exhibits from the 12/2010 Evidentiary Hearing; granting 113 (and #23 in case no 2:10-cv-789) Motion for Leave to Amend the Answer and Counterclaim. The amended pleading shall be filed within fourteen days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 5/2/2011. (er1)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER finding as moot 56 Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production of Documents & granting 59 Amended Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 2/16/2010. (kk2)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER denying 37 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 8/19/2009. (mra1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kehoe Component Sales, Inc v. Best Lighting Products, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kehoe Component Sales, Inc | |
| Represented By: | James Douglas Colner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Best Lighting Products, Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
