Friedman v. Castle Aviation et al
Richard J. Friedman, Jr. |
Castle Aviation, Avion Capital Corporation, Total Airport Services, Columbus Regional Airport Authority, The Cessna Aircraft Company and The Estate of James A. Babcock, Deceased |
2:2009cv00749 |
August 25, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
Terence P Kemp |
Edmund A Sargus |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 124 JUDGMENT is hereby entered pursuant to the Order filed 06/04/2012 in favor of Columbus Regional Airport Authority only. (dh1) |
Filing 112 ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 10/2/2012 at 9:30 AM; Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/1/2012 at 9:00 AM; and Jury Trial set for 11/12/2012 at 9:00 AM. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 01/27/2012. (Attachment: FPTO Form) (dh1) |
Filing 102 ORDER denying as moot 81 Motion of Defendant Cessna Aircraft Company to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint and denying as moot 94 Unopposed Motion of Defendant Cessna Aircraft Company for an Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, as the motions were filed prior to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint 100 . Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 11/09/2011. (dh1) |
Filing 79 OPINION AND ORDER granting 66 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint and denying as moot 58 Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 05/17/2011. (dh1) |
Filing 78 OPINION AND ORDER denying 61 the Columbus Regional Airport Authority's Motion to Dismiss. The Court denies as moot 74 the Columbus Regional Airport Authority's Motion for Ruling on Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and 77 Motion Requesting Scheduling of a Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 05/05/2011. (dh1) |
Filing 55 OPINION AND ORDER giving the Plaintiff 14 days to amend his Complaint as outlined in the Opinion and Order. If Plaintiff does not amend his Complaint within 14 days, CRAA's Motion to Dismiss 14 will be granted as to the claims against CRAA. CRAA's Motion for a ruling 51 is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 08/09/2010. (dh) |
Filing 42 CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER. Order represents a valid and binding agreement of the parties and may be modified at any time by motion of any party or by the Court upon its own motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 04/07/2010. (sr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.