Hendricks v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
| Kelly Riehle, John & Jane Does x25, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Belmont Correctional Institution, John DesMarais, Mona Parks, Theresa Bell, Michelle Miller and Susan Nesbitt |
| Benjamin Hendricks |
| 2:2011cv00040 |
| January 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| PICKAWAY |
| Terence P Kemp |
| Michael H. Watson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
OPINION and ORDER granting 101 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 106 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 9/25/13. (jk1)
|
|
Filing
106
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that 101 MOTION for Summary Judgment be granted. Objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 2/28/2013. (kk2)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 78 Motion to Compel, denying the request for appointment counsel and sanctions & denying as moot 83 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 6/8/2012. (kk2)
|
|
Filing
62
OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 11/30/11. (jk1)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 8/18/2011. The motion for leave to amend (doc. 28 ) is granted in part and denied in part. The motion to compel (doc. 30 ) and the motion for sanctions (doc. 37 ) are denied. The motion for reduc ed number of copies (doc. 27 ) is granted in part and denied in part. The declaration in support of a TRO and preliminary injunction (# 24 ) is not construed as a motion and shall be removed from the Court's pending motions list. The motion for summary judgment (doc. 12 ) is denied as moot. The motion for extension of time (doc. 31 ) also is denied as moot. (pes1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
