Mulch Manufacturing Inc v. Advanced Polymer Solutions, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Mulch Manufacturing Inc
Defendant: Advanced Polymer Solutions, LLC and John M. Ryan
Case Number: 2:2011cv00325
Filed: April 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: LICKING
Presiding Judge: Terence P Kemp
Presiding Judge: Edmund A Sargus
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 62 AGREED DISMISSAL ORDER. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs, and the Court ORDERS that it shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement agreement in this matter. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 11/26/2013. (dh1)
June 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER: As the parties have informed the Court that this case is settled, the current trial schedule is VACATED. The parties are directed to file a Joint Status Report 30 days from the date of this Order, unless they have filed a dismissal entry prior to that time. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 06/03/2013. (dh1)
May 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 46 APS's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 47 MMI's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 05/23/2013. (dh1)
April 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER denying 55 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Attend Settlement Conference by Telephone and to Excuse Personal Attendance. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 04/29/2013. (dh1)
November 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference set for 5/28/2013 at 9:30 AM: Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/27/2013 at 9:00 AM; and Jury Trial set for 7/8/2013 at 9:00 AM. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 11/27/2012. (Attachment: FPTO Form) (dh1)
February 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER denying 13 Defendants Advanced Polymer Solutions, LLC's and John M. Ryan's Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Want of Personal Jurisdiction and/or Improper Venue. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 02/27/2012. (dh1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mulch Manufacturing Inc v. Advanced Polymer Solutions, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mulch Manufacturing Inc
Represented By: David John Butler
Represented By: Stephen Charles Fitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advanced Polymer Solutions, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John M. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?