Snelling v. ATC Healthcare Services Inc. et al
| Dawn Snelling |
| Nursemate, Inc. and ATC Healthcare Services Inc. |
| 2:2011cv00983 |
| November 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Norah McCann King |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ORDER re 08/27/14 Fairness Hearing. For the reasons stated in open court, Plaintiffs' Motion for attorneys' fees is granted. The Court adopts the Settlement Agreement as an Order of the Court. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement until the final payment is made by Defendants thereunder. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 08/27/2014. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER Second amended complaint due 8/12/13. No later than August 31, 2013, the parties shall file a report confirming the scheduling of a private mediation to occur no later than mid-December 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/06/13. (rew)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER the Court will conduct a telephone status conference on July 2, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel shall call the Court at 614-719-3390. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 5/02/13. (rew)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER approving the parties Joint Notice and Consent Form submitted to the Court on 04/15/13. As detailed in the Court's 04/04/13 Opinion and Order, Plaintiff shall mail the notice and consent forms to prospective class members within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 04/16/2013. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
70
OPINION AND ORDER denying 55 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order and overruling 63 Defendants' Objections to the Magistrate Judge's 02/07/13 Opinion and Order. The directions for the notice and consent forms are outlined in the Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 04/04/13. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting 64 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 2/27/13. (rew)
|
|
Filing
61
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denied in part Motion to Compel, Doc. No. 39 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 2/07/13. (rew1)
|
|
Filing
54
OPINION AND ORDER granting 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Class Certification subject to the conditions outlined in this Opinion and Order. The parties should confer as to the proper form of notice and submit a proposed notice form, an d plan for the distribution of notice, within 14 days of the date of this Opinion and Order. Defendants should also produce contact information for the nurses they employed during the relevant period within 14 days. Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification of Her State Law Claim 36 is denied. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 12/04/2012. (dh1)
|
|
Filing
46
OPINION AND ORDER granting and denying 23 motion to amend and motion to stay. Motions 13 & 14 are moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 10/10/12. (rew)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 20 Motion to strike, 21 28 Motion for extension of time in which to file a motion to certify a rule 23 class. Plaintiffs shall file their motion to certify a class under Rule 23 no later than August 10, 2012. Plaintiffs may have until August 10, 2012 in which to file a reply in support of their motion for leave to amend. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 7/31/12. (rew)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
