Eastham et al v. Chesapeake Appalachia LLC
William Eastham and Frostie Eastham |
Chesapeake Appalachia LLC |
Chesapeake Appalachia LLC |
Frostie Eastham and William Eastham |
2:2012cv00615 |
July 11, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
JEFFERSON |
Gregory L Frost |
Terence P Kemp |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1337 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 ORDER granting 33 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 35 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment; Defendant's counterclaim remains pending in this action. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 9/18/13. (sem1) |
Filing 52 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part 34 Renewed MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint to the extent that it seeks to withdraw the claims for class certification. Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint w/in seven (7) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 9/6/2013. (kk2) |
Filing 50 ORDER OVERRULING 43 Plaintiffs' Objections and DENIES Reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's 7/23/13 Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 9/4/13. (sem1) |
Filing 42 OPINION AND ORDER denying in part and withholds judgment in part as to 34 Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. The Court defers judgment on whether Plaintiffs may be permitted to withdraw the class allegations until after further briefing is completed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 7/23/2013. (er1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.