Verathon, Inc. v. DEX One Service, Inc. d/b/a DEX et al

Plaintiff: Verathon, Inc.
Defendant: DEX Corporation Northeast
Case Number: 2:2013cv00205
Filed: March 4, 2013
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Office: Columbus Office
County: FRANKLIN
Referring Judge: Terence P Kemp
Presiding Judge: Algenon L. Marbley
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 16, 2013 19 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER OF POSSESSION granting 2 Motion for Replevin; denying 8 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 4/16/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment 1) (cw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Verathon, Inc. v. DEX One Service, Inc. d/b/a DEX et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Verathon, Inc.
Represented By: Keith R Kraus
Represented By: Richard N Selby, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEX Corporation Northeast
Represented By: Kris Banvard
Represented By: Marion H Little
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.