Eberly-Bomlitz v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Plaintiff: Christine Eberly-Bomlitz
Case Number: 2:2013cv00968
Filed: September 27, 2013
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Office: Columbus Office
County: LICKING
Referring Judge: Mark R. Abel
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Watson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1681
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 3, 2014 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER memorializing the 2/3/14 Telephone Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 2/3/14. (sem1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eberly-Bomlitz v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine Eberly-Bomlitz
Represented By: Marc E Dann
Represented By: Grace M Doberdruk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.