Duncan v. Husted
| Richard Duncan |
| Jon A. Husted |
| 2:2013cv01157 |
| November 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Terence P Kemp |
| Algenon L. Marbley |
| Voting |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER granting 64 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 80 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 8/26/2015. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
63
OPINION AND ORDER denying 52 Motion for Permission to Subpoena and Depose Pat McDonald; granting 53 Motion To Allow Duncan's Scheduled Depositions By Non-Stenographic Means; denying 62 Motion For The Secretary of State To Furnish A Publ ic Records Request Prior To Any Depositions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 4/7/2015. (agm1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified text on 4/7/2015 (agm1).
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting 41 Motion for Reconsideration GRANTING re 23 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Jon A. Husted. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 02/12/2015. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant Husted's 42 Motion. The Court's 39 Order granting in part and denying in part Defendant Husted's motion for a protective order, 23 , is stayed pending the Court's resolution of Defendant Husted's objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 10/2/2014. (agm1)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying as moot 35 Motion for a ruling on several pending motions ; granting 36 Motion to Extend Time for Filing Summary Judgment Motions ; granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and den ying in part 24 Motion to Quash of Non-Party State Senator John Eklund ; granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Quash of Non-Party State Senator Bill Seitz ; granting 27 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 9/17/2014. (agm1)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER denying 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 3/20/2014. (cw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Duncan v. Husted | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Duncan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jon A. Husted | |
| Represented By: | Holly Wilson Wallinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
