Wilson et al v. Brachfeld et al
| Holly Wilson and Chad Wilson |
| Erica Lynn Brachfeld and Brachfeld Law Group |
| 2:2013cv01231 |
| December 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| PERRY |
| Mark R. Abel |
| Michael H. Watson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER adopting 19 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 8/11/14. (jk1)
|
|
Filing
19
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 10 MOTION for Default Judgment. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that each Defendant be found liable to the Plaintiffs in the amount of $200 in statutory damages under the CSPA and liable for noneconomic damage s of $5,000 to each Plaintiff. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that defendants be found liable to Plaintiffs for violations of the TCPA in the amount of $9,000. Plaintiffs are also entitled to recover interest, costs, and attorney fees, and the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that plaintiffs be awarded $4317.50 in attorney fees and $400 in costs, for a total amount of $4717.50, which amount is found to be fair and reasonable. The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that plaintiffs be awarded from Defendants, jointly and severally, the sum of $45,917.50, plus statutory interest from the date of judgment - objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 07/17/2014. (sr1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
