Pierce v. Mohr
Ricky H. Pierce |
Beth Higginbotham, Mona Parks, Eddy, Gary Mohr and Gary Artrip |
2:2014cv00889 |
July 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
ROSS |
Mark R. Abel |
James L Graham |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 13 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 11/17/2014. (ds) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 10 Amended Complaint filed by Ricky H. Pierce. It is hereby RECOMMENDED that the complaint be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. §1983 - objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Defendants are not required to answer the complaint unless later ordered to do so by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 09/29/2014. (sr1) |
Filing 5 INITIAL SCREENING AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 4 Complaint filed by Ricky H. Pierce. It is ORDERED that plaintiff file an amended complaint within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this Report and Recommendation stating as to each defen dant what action he or she took to deny him needed medical care and the date(s) each defendant denied him needed medical care. If plaintiff fails to do so, it is RECOMMENDED that this lawsuit be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim for relief against the individual defendants - objections due w/in fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 07/18/2014. (sr1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.