Imani v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution et al
| Sekou Muata Imani |
| Warden, Noble Correctional Institution, Aufdinkampe, Hupp, Burghy and Griffin |
| 2:2014cv01358 |
| August 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| ROSS |
| Gregory L Frost |
| Norah McCann King |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 22 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 9/15/15. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Hupp. It is RECOMMENDED that the motion be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 9/11/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/245/2015 (pes)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 10/30/14. (kn)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 4 Complaint filed by Sekou Muata Imani. Objections to R&R due by 9/11/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/25/2014. (pes1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
