Carter v. Clerk of Court of Columbus Franklin et al
| Anna M. Vines Carter |
| Mt. Carmel Hospital, Doctor West, Wealthy History, Clerk of Court of Columbus Franklin, Riverside Hospital, COTA Bus and St. Michael Holy Cross |
| 2:2014cv02344 |
| November 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| James L Graham |
| Terence P Kemp |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 2 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 12/17/14. (ds)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
2
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Anna M. Vines Carter. It is further recommended that this case be dismissed as frivilous under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2). Objections to R&R due by 12/1 2/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 11/25/2014. (agm1) (This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular and certified mail (7009 2820 0003 5795 7873) to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified to include certified mailing information on 11/25/2014 (agm1).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
