Beckett v. KHB Lonestar LLC
| Roger Beckett |
| KHB Lonestar LLC |
| 2:2023cv00520 |
| February 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| James L Graham |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint filed by Defendant KHB Lonestar LLC. (Horowitz, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #14 Motion to Stay Discovery. The parties are ORDERED to schedule a status conference with the Court once there is a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #11 ), if any portion of the case survives. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 5/22/2023. (kk2)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTATION ORDER - In light of the Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc. 14), the Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/23/23 is VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 5/19/23. (jr)
|
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Plaintiff Roger Beckett. (Breedlove, Trisha)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTATION ORDER issued in that the Court expedites briefing on Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery #14 . Plaintiff is ORDERED to respond on or before May 23, 2023. Defendant will have three (3) days thereafter to reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 5/17/2023. (sem)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #14 MOTION to Stay Discovery. Per the Court's 5/17/2023 Notation Order, Plaintiff's Response due on or before 5/23/2023. Defendant will have three (3) days thereafter to reply. (sem)
|
|
Filing 15
RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff Roger Beckett. (Breedlove, Trisha)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendant KHB Lonestar LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Horowitz, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 5/23/2023 10:45 AM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson. (jr)
|
|
Filing 12
BRIEF by Defendant KHB Lonestar LLC. (Horowitz, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant KHB Lonestar LLC. (Horowitz, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 10
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant KHB Lonestar LLC. (Horowitz, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTATION ORDER granting #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. KHB Lonestar LLC answer due 5/3/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 4/20/23. (jr)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Jack Horowitz for Defendant KHB Lonestar LLC (Horowitz, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER re #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by KHB Lonestar LLC: The Motion is signed by Andrew J Horowitz, who is not admitted to the bar of this Court and has not yet filed a motion to appear pro hac vice. The Court will hold its ruling on the Consent Motion (Doc. 6) in abeyance until either: Mr. Horowitz moves for and is granted leave to appear pro hac vice; or the Motion is refiled with a signature from an attorney admitted to this Court's bar. If he wishes to be designated as Defendant's Trial Attorney, Mr. Horowitz must similarly make a motion before the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 4/6/2023. (kk2)
|
|
Filing 6
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, New date requested 5/3/2023. by Defendant KHB Lonestar LLC. (Horowitz, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Returned Unexecuted as to KHB Lonestar LLC. (4031 Industrial Park Road Cadiz, OH 43907). Contents in envelope ECF #3 , #2 & #1 . (vb)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant KHB Lonestar LLC served on 3/9/2023. Answer due 3/30/2023. (vb)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk to KHB LONESTAR LLC Registered Agent, 44568 Mayfield Road, Cleveland OH (7021 1970 0000 0636 8608). KHB LONESTAR 43031 Industrial Park Road Cadiz OH (7021 1970 0000 0636 8615). A copy of the Complaint & issued Summons was sent via certified mail. (vb)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to KHB Lonestar LLC. (ds)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against KHB Lonestar LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9255193), filed by Roger Beckett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form Summons x2, #3 Exhibit Right to Sue) (Breedlove, Trisha)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Beckett v. KHB Lonestar LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roger Beckett | |
| Represented By: | Trisha M. Breedlove |
| Represented By: | Gregory T. Shumaker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KHB Lonestar LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Jack Horowitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
