Learned v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
3:2005cv00268 |
July 27, 2005 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office |
Sharon L Ovington |
Thomas M Rose |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 DECISION AND ORDER the Court hereby ORDERS that: 1. The parties Joint Motion To Award Attorney Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice Act (Doc. # 31 ) is GRANTED; 2. The Commissioner shall pay Plaintiffs attorney fees directly to Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the EAJA in the total amount of $2,500.00; 3. Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. # 30 ) is DENIED as moot; and 4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 07/27/09. (phil1, ) |
Filing 26 ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING THE COMMISSIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 25 ); ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 24 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY; VACATING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY FINDING AND REMANDING THIS MATTER TO THE COMMISSIONER. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 3/30/09. (bev1, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Learned v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.