Learned v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2005cv00268
Filed: July 27, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
Presiding Judge: Sharon L Ovington
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 DECISION AND ORDER the Court hereby ORDERS that: 1. The parties Joint Motion To Award Attorney Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice Act (Doc. # 31 ) is GRANTED; 2. The Commissioner shall pay Plaintiffs attorney fees directly to Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the EAJA in the total amount of $2,500.00; 3. Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. # 30 ) is DENIED as moot; and 4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 07/27/09. (phil1, )
March 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING THE COMMISSIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 25 ); ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 24 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY; VACATING THE COMMISSIONER'S NON-DISABILITY FINDING AND REMANDING THIS MATTER TO THE COMMISSIONER. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 3/30/09. (bev1, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Learned v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?