Sulek v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
| 3:2006cv00238 |
| August 2, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN FULL THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON JUNE 4, 2009 (Doc. 8 ; DENYING AND DISMISSING KEITH SULEK'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Doc. 1 ); DENYING AS MOOT PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (Doc. 9 ); AND TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET OF THE COURT. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 6/23/2009. (jdf1)
|
|
Filing
8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Keith Sulek's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) be denied and dismissed; 2. A certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. §2253(c) not issue; and 3. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. OBJECTIONS TO R&R DUE BY 6/22/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 6/4/09. (bev1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sulek v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
