Harden v. Bush et al
Case Number: 3:2006cv00248
Filed: August 14, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
Presiding Judge: Sharon L Ovington
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 57 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 53 in 3:06-cv-00248-WHR-SLO) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC 54 in 3:06-cv-00248-WHR-SLO) OVERRU LED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 46 in 3:06-cv-00248-WHR-SLO) OVERRULED; DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 48 in 3:06-cv-00248-WHR-SLO) SUSTAINED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE REMAINING DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Walter H Rice on 6/12/2009. (jdf1, )
April 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 46 ) be DENIED; 2. Defendant Bush's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 48 ) be GRANTED; and 3. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 5/4/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 4/16/2009. (jdf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harden v. Bush et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?