Brewer v. Montgomery County Sheriff et al
| Damond Brewer |
| Montgomery County Sheriff, Paul D Henson, Butler Township Police Department, Montgomery County Commissioners and Butler Township Officer |
| 3:2008cv00311 |
| August 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Defendant Henson's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Based on that decision, the Court finds Defendant Plummer is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The Clerk will accordingly enter judgment dismissing the Complaint with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/15/2010. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
33
NOTICE TO COUNSEL - This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Butler Township Police Department (Doc. No. 32). Plaintiff desires to dismiss without prejudice; Butler Township will consent to dismissal only with prejudice. I t is the Court's understanding that a dismissal without prejudice of the case against Butler Township would leave these two parties as if nothing had been done, no suit had been filed. The Court further understands that the two-year statute of limitations for claims under § 1983 has expired and this claim would not be saved by the Ohio savings statute, Ohio Revised Code § 2305.19. Therefore a dismissal without prejudice may leave the claim barred by the statute of limitations. Counsel should by their own research satisfy themselves whether the Court's understanding is correct. If it is, the parties may wish to reconsider their positions on the Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/9/2009. (kopf1, )
|
|
Filing
26
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO BIFURCATE - Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/27/2009. (kopf1, )
|
|
Filing
17
MINUTE ENTRY - This case came on for a telephone conference on outstanding discovery issues at 1:30 p.m. on July 6, 2009. While a number of different issues which may have an impact on scheduling and/or may require additional orders from the Court w ere discussed, the only matter presently requiring an order is Plaintiff's production of documents requested by Ms. Dinkler and not yet produced. All such documents will be produced to her not later than July 20, 2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/6/2009. (kopf1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
