Federal Insurance Company v. Mazer Corporation
Plaintiff: Federal Insurance Company
Defendant: Mazer Corporation
Case Number: 3:2008cv00374
Filed: October 14, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Insurance Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOR OF FIRST-FILED STATE COURT ACTION, (DOC. 7 ), ORDERING CLERK TO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 03/11/09. (phil1, ) Modified on 3/11/2009 (phil1, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Federal Insurance Company v. Mazer Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Federal Insurance Company
Represented By: Daniel F Gourash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mazer Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?