Clay v. Muffler Man
Plaintiff: Kevin Clay
Defendant: Muffler Man
Case Number: 3:2008cv00440
Filed: December 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Presiding Judge: Michael R Merz
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 DECISION AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Complaint is accordingly barred by the statute of limitations provided in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f). The Motion to Dismiss is granted and the Clerk will enter judgment dismissing the Complaint with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/12/2009. (kopf1, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clay v. Muffler Man
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Muffler Man
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?