Capps v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Jerome S. Capps |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2011cv00182 |
| May 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| PREBLE |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
DECISION AND ENTRY granting 19 Motion for Attorney Fees - 2. The Commissioner shall pay Plaintiffs attorney fees from Plaintiffs past-due benefits, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b), in the amount of $11,300.00; 3. Upon receipt of the fee award of $11,300.00, Plaintiffs counsel shall forthwith remit the EAJA fee of $5,650.00 directly to Plaintiff; and 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 12/31/13. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
18
DECISION AND ORDER - The Court hereby ORDERS that: 1. The parties' Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. # 17 ) is accepted, and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff's attorney fees unde r 28 U.S.C. §2412 in the total amount of $5,650.00; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. # 15 ) is DENIED as moot; 3. Defendant is directed to verify, within thirty days of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendations, wh ether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United States that is subject to offset. If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant is ordered to pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff's counsel; and 4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 7/11/12. (cib1)
|
|
Filing
14
JUDGMENT in favor of Jerome S. Capps against Commissioner of Social Security. Case Terminated. Signed on 05/16/2012. (kf)
|
|
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Complaint filed by Jerome S. Capps. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The Commissioner's non-disability finding be vacated; 2. No finding be made as to whether Plaintiff Jerome Capps was under adisability w ithin the meaning of the Social Security Act; 3. This case be remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Report; and 4. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 5/14/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 04/26/2012. (kf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Capps v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jerome S. Capps | |
| Represented By: | Eddy Pierre Pierre |
| Represented By: | Jay Thomas Bosken |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
