Cantrell v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Matt Cantrell |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
3:2014cv00029 |
January 28, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
MONTGOMERY |
Thomas M Rose |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO INFORM THE COURT NOT LATER THAN FEBRUARY 20, 2014, OF THE NAME AND CITIZENSHIP OF EACH PARTNER. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 1/30/14. (ep) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cantrell v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Karen L Giffen |
Represented By: | Kerin Lyn Kaminski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Matt Cantrell | |
Represented By: | David Michael Duwel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.